The Wire: The Advantage of Getting Up in Others’ Enterprise


I used to be twenty years late to HBO’s The Wire, nevertheless it was well worth the wait. Not not like a lot of the most effective fashionable TV, it’s morally complicated, plagued by antiheroes, and tells an sincere, even uncooked, story.

. . . confrontation must be an imminently native enterprise, properly deployed inside relational circles of care and accountability.

The present is chock-full of memorable one-liners, too, from Omar’s quip about capital (“Man, cash ain’t acquired no homeowners. Solely spenders.”) to Slim Charles’s lucid articulation of that wistful affection for the previous we name nostalgia (“The factor concerning the outdated days: they the outdated days.”). However no one-liner lands fairly just like the Deacon’s reply to Dennis “Cutty” Sensible’s query about why he appeared so excited about what folks like Cutty had been as much as: “An excellent church man is at all times up in everybody’s shit. It’s how we do.”

I knew there was one thing particular concerning the Deacon’s pith once I heard it, so I jotted that one down. Since then I’ve mulled it over, dropped it in conversations with buddies, and wrestled with its implications, a few which struck me as worthy of exposition.

Confrontation Is a Advantage

First, the Deacon’s comment reminds us that irrespective of how abused, or how uncomfortable it generally makes us, getting up in others’ enterprise is usually a advantage, or, on this context, one thing “good church folks” needs to be doing recurrently.

I think many readers might be disinclined to agree with the Deacon, doubtless for one of some dangerous, albeit comprehensible, causes. Maybe, like me, you’ve been on the receiving finish of some form of bastardized confrontation. You’ve been subjected to an ungodly present of power or manipulation throughout a face-to-face alternate with a mum or dad, partner, or employer. Or maybe somebody (or some bot) you’ve by no means met has subjected you to a digital, though no much less demeaning, assault, utilizing social media to aggressively, and unfairly, blast you to Timbuktu through tweetstorm.

Or possibly the concept of confrontation rubs you the improper approach as a result of the Jesus you’ve been taught to admire was purportedly solely “light Jesus, meek and delicate.” I’ll as properly let you know plainly {that a} Jesus like that belies the account of Scripture. However don’t take my phrase for it: learn the eyewitnesses’ accounts of Jesus’s cleaning the Temple (Matt. 21:12-27; Mark 11:15-19; Luke 19:45-46; John 2:13-16).

No matter your causes for pondering in any other case, I submit that the Deacon—whose comment to Cutty reminds us that confrontation is one thing we needs to be doing recurrently—was on to one thing. That mentioned, getting up in others’ enterprise has—no matter an Alan Jackson refrain on the contrary—the potential of changing into an excessive amount of of a great factor and should, like all good issues, be hemmed in and properly deployed.

Which leads me to my subsequent level: to take care of its standing as a advantage, confrontation should, to co-opt the phrasing of Larry David, be curbed.

Curbing Our Confrontation

Though it has a nicer ring to it, I couldn’t entitle this text “The Advantage of Getting Up in All people’s Enterprise” as a result of getting up in everyone’s enterprise isn’t a advantage; it’s a vice. In brief, simply as hearth belongs in a fire, or intercourse to marriage, so confrontation should be appropriately cabined. Let confrontation run rampant, and it’ll singe—if not outright incinerate—the whole lot in its path.

Put one other approach, the form of confrontation I’m endorsing (and, I believe, our Deacon illustrates) isn’t purported to be world. As a substitute, confrontation must be an imminently native enterprise, properly deployed inside relational circles of care and accountability. Suppose Wendell Berry, not Thomas Friedman. And yet another level. If you happen to ask Google to outline “confrontation,” you’ll be advised it means a hostile or indignant assembly between opposing events. Though that will represent a dictionary definition, that’s not the sense wherein I’m utilizing it right here. These with whom we’re in relationship don’t want one other indignant encounter however a pal who sees and is aware of them.

If you happen to’ve seen the present, then you recognize the Deacon’s relationship with Cutty bears this out. In reality, you’ll be able to draw a straight line between the Deacon’s intervention in Cutty’s life and Cutty’s determination to open a boxing gymnasium—the place dozens of younger males are inspired to show away from drug dealing in favor of sports activities, even when solely briefly. 

Nonetheless, you will have caught your self questioning why the Deacon didn’t set up some form of program or undertaking, the place his “knowledge about who needs to be the place” could possibly be shared extra broadly. In spite of everything, no less than as portrayed, it appears potential—even doubtless—that the Deacon might have made extra waves in additional parolees’ lives, thereby doing extra to handle the Baltimore drug drawback. Little doubt there have been extra parolees in want of friendship and paternalistic care. However the Deacon’s “program” stayed small, even private (distinction that with police commander Bunny Colvin’s “Hamsterdam” undertaking).

Though we’re by no means advised whether or not the Deacon operated out of an explicitly biblical worldview or professed evangelical religion in Jesus (solely that he was “a great church man,” no matter meaning), the “curbed confrontation” he practiced with Cutty is ostensibly sanctioned by Jesus in Matthew 18:15-20, a passage commentator Frederick Dale Bruner memorably describes as “the Magna Carta of confrontation.”

In full disclosure, Bruner says that Matthew 18:15-20 teaches that “it is just the Christian brother or sister whom we’re to confront.” I suppose that’s honest, particularly given the conditional “In case your brother sins towards you . . . ” with which verse 15 begins, and the “churchly” flip taken in verses 16 and 17: “But when [your brother] doesn’t pay attention, take one or two others together with you . . . . If he refuses to hearken to them, inform it to the church.”

There’s a particular form of confrontation (i.e., church self-discipline) for ecclesial communities. Nonetheless, I believe a broader precept justifying confrontation inside relational circles of care and accountability (just like the Deacon practiced) may be rightly deduced from Matthew’s textual content by good and essential consequence.

Whereas many would possibly do properly to keep away from The Wire for the sake of a pure conscience (the present is, in any case, laced with hetero- and gay intercourse scenes, callous violence, and foul language), we’d all—churched and non-churched alike—profit from a large-scale adoption of the Deacon’s mindset, particularly, to not be afraid, as acceptable, to stand up into others’ enterprise. Because the Deacon would say, “It’s how we do.”


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here